LESSONS FROM DUGGER-PORTER DEBATE:
In our day to day life
we’re engaged in debates over a number of issues both religious and secular.
Elder A.N.Dugger has been said to be one of the greatest debaters in the recent
history of the COG, severally I’ve gone through his debates the famous one
being Dugger- Porter debate: This was a written discussion on the Sabbath and
the Lord’s day between elder Dugger (a Sabbath keeper) and elder W.C.Porter (an
evangelist of Church of Christ-Sunday keeper).
·
In a debate on Biblical doctrine, one
must be well versed in the Bible. On proposing that Sabbath is to be kept in
this age, elder Dugger opened his affirmation with the book of Gen.2:1-3 and
goes on to quote other 47 Biblical verses. The trend continues with Bible
verses all through the debate.
·
Other proves are acceptable in a
Biblical debate- In his first affirmation elder Dugger quotes other sources of
information than the Bible: He quotes from the following sources, Webster
Dictionary, Greek writings and a book by the name ‘The weekly cycle’ throughout
the debate other sources are quoted to support an argument.
·
In a debate one might decide to play
treacherously, this is evident in elder W.C.Porter’s first negative. Even after
over 40 Biblical verses, Porter still asks for proof! There are other
incidences of treachery in the debate, but this doesn’t help the debater but
expose him as insincere person.
·
In a debate, questions raised need to be
answered and or else they’ll haunt the respondent. This is evident in a number
of questions that both elder Dugger and Porter didn’t answer and ultimately
exposed some of their weaknesses.
·
In a debate it’s good to keep an eye on
the subject and not sideshows. In his 1st affirmation elder Porter
mentions that Sunday should be kept holy because Jesus resurrected on Sunday.
If most of us could be in elder Dugger’s position, we could have taken that
chance to ‘teach’ Porter the real day of crucifixion and resurrection. Dugger
kept an eye on the subject matter and waited till his final submissions to
respond to the resurrection issue.
·
In a debate one might be desperate to
prove his case and thus ends up in ‘name calling’ or attacking the personality
of his opponent. Such a move is aimed at intimidating the opponent and thus
silencing him. This is something that a good and sincere debater should refrain
from.
·
In any debate, it’s good to know when to
quit. Some debates are moderated by a neutral person and thus will determine
when to end it. In unmoderated debates, once ‘intimidation’, cycle debate
(repeat of points), many unanswered questions etc starts showing up then know
that it’s time to hang up.
Brethren these are just
but a few of many lessons that I learnt from that book, look for a copy and you
can learn more.
Be Blessed.